Keeping alumni and friends connected to U-M

Vivace device
Mechanical engineer Eun Soo Kim with the Vivace device, shortly before its deployment in June of 2016. The indentations on the surface of the cylinders will help water currents push them back and forth, increasing the device’s efficiency. (Image: Vortex Hydro Energy.)

Startup bets on ‘slow water’

By Gabe Cherry

A revolution in clean energy?

It’s a perfect summer afternoon on the Saint Clair River, on the Canadian border just north of Detroit. Pleasure boats skim across the bright blue water as picnickers watch from the grassy bank. They don’t notice the fat black data cable that snakes out of the water, along a concrete pier and through a hole in the brick wall of an old paper mill on the opposite riverbank.

The device could one day make it possible to generate power from river and ocean currents around the globe — most of which flow at speeds far below those required by today’s hydroelectric devices.
Behind that wall, under orange factory lights, sits mechanical engineer Eun Soo Kim and the VIVACE team, including electrical engineer Jason Taipale and Hai Sun, a visiting scholar in the University of Michigan Department of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering. In their borrowed workspace, they’re mulling over the best way to fix a generator that rests on the river bottom. They can see that a key has slipped out of place, jamming the drive mechanism.

If this were an ordinary generator, the fix would likely be simple. But it’s far from ordinary. In fact, it could be a revolution in clean energy.

In a milestone that took more than a decade to reach, the team is testing the first commercial-scale prototype of a device designed to generate electricity from slow-moving river and ocean currents. Called VIVACE, the device harnesses a phenomenon called flow-induced motion. It weighs 12 tons and it’s submerged in 26 feet of water.

“I imagine this would be a beautiful place for a holiday,” Kim shouts over the roar of papermaking machinery. “But we’ve been in here all summer while everyone out there enjoys the river.”

Rewriting the rules

A U-M alum, Kim turned down a job with a major global electronics maker for the opportunity to work on a project that may someday rewrite the rules of hydroelectric power. He’s the mechanical engineer at the U-M startup Vortex Hydro Energy, founded in 2004 by Michael Bernitsas, the Mortimer E. Cooley Collegiate Professor of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering at U-M.

The company is working with the U-M Marine Renewable Energy Laboratory to build and market a device that could last decades underwater, churning out power for utility companies. Their present research is funded by the U.S. Department of Energy.

The cable from outside carries a video feed of the device: a 16-foot wide, 12-foot tall steel frame with four vertical aluminum cylinders mounted on rails. The cylinders slide silently from side to side, pushed by the river’s slow three-knot current. On a typical day, each cylinder can generate one kilowatt — about enough electricity to power one home.

Revisiting those agents of destruction

VIVACE generates power mainly by harnessing vortex-induced vibrations. These are lateral movements that happen when tiny vortices — like miniature whirlpools — form in a current of air or water as it flows past a stationary object. These vortices exert alternating sideways force on the object, pushing it from side to side.

VIVACE also uses a second phenomenon, called galloping, to generate even more power. Galloping occurs when turbulence from one cylinder affects the movement of those behind it, whipping them back and forth more quickly and increasing the amount of power generated.

Most engineers consider these forces to be agents of destruction. They’ve shredded power lines, toppled chimneys and buildings and demolished offshore platforms. They even caused the spectacular destruction of the Tacoma Narrows Bridge back in 1940. Generations of engineers have dedicated their careers to fighting them. But Bernitsas and the VIVACE team are doing just the opposite.

They see flow-induced motion as a way to harness slow-moving water currents and revolutionize hydroelectric power generation. Their device could one day make it possible to generate power from river and ocean currents around the globe — most of which flow at speeds far below those required by today’s hydroelectric devices.

“Today’s hydroelectric devices are turbines, so they’re based on water mills and propellers,” Bernitsas says. “And that’s not the natural way of moving in water. Flow-induced motion, on the other hand, is everywhere.”

Powering the future

Bernitsas believes that harnessing the energy in slower-moving water would dramatically increase the world’s potential for hydroelectric power. He says VIVACE is also better for the environment than today’s hydroelectric generators. It doesn’t require disruptive and environmentally harmful dams, and its slow-moving cylinders are friendlier to fish and other wildlife than a fast-spinning turbine.

But taming one of nature’s most destructive and unpredictable forces hasn’t been easy. Learning how to harness complex flow-induced motion has taken decades of research, dozens of papers, and countless lab and field tests. And they’ve found that often, conventional knowledge isn’t much help.

The ability to generate more power in less space is crucial to helping renewable energy compete with fossil fuels.
For example, that knowledge suggested that to generate power efficiently, VIVACE’s cylinders would have to be spaced far away from each other to minimize the interference between them. This is standard practice with turbines, and the team assumed VIVACE would work the same way. It didn’t.

“We probably wasted a year-and-a-half, placing the cylinders further and further apart and still getting interference,” Bernitsas says.

Ultimately, the team solved the problem by eschewing the engineering literature and instead learning from fish. In schools, fish undulate their bodies to squeeze between the alternating vortices created by their schoolmates. This pushes them forward efficiently.

The VIVACE team reasoned they could use the same idea, placing the cylinders closer together to take advantage of turbulence rather than fighting it. The discovery was a breakthrough that led to the current device’s configuration, with four closely spaced vertical cylinders. The ability to generate more power in less space, Bernitsas explains, is crucial to helping renewable energy compete with fossil fuels.

“Power density is the Achilles’ heel of renewable energy technologies, and the ability to put cylinders close together puts us far ahead of other renewables,” he says. “Big wind farms generate about 0.01 watt per cubic meter of space when the wind is blowing at 12 meters per second. We get about 800 watts per cubic meter from an equivalent flow of water — 80,000 times higher. But we’re still three orders of magnitude below fossil fuel.”

Getting schooled

Back at the test site, the VIVACE team determines that they’ll need to hire a specially trained diver to fix the mechanical drive problem. The fix will cost $12,000, and with the diver’s busy schedule, it won’t be complete for several weeks.

It’s a frustrating situation, but the team takes it in stride. After all, solving problems like this is the reason they’re out here. Dealing with complex and unpredictable currents, tweaking the machinery to stand up to gritty river sediment, and finding the best way to get the massive device into the water are all steps that could never be duplicated in a lab. While a commercially viable device is likely years off, this fix — and the others that will inevitably follow — will put the team ever closer to a new, commercially viable source of clean energy.

The VIVACE commercial prototype spent nearly three months underwater in a long-term, real-world test of its durability and efficiency. It came out of the water in early September and the researchers are analyzing their results.

“We have a good device, but taking principles from schools of fish and turning them into mechanical devices takes time,” Bernitsas says. “It’s a long process, but for us, it’s also very exciting.”

Gabe Cherry

Gabe Cherry

GABE CHERRY is a news and feature writer in the College of Engineering's Office of Communications & Marketing.


  • Gerry Barranda - 1970

    Very much appreciated if you can send me your business plan and updates / progress of your commercialization process

    thank you


  • Karol Krohn - 1981

    What an exciting project! Are you working in conjunction with any energy storage companies yet (e.g., Enerdel in Indianapolis)? Perhaps Michigan has moved ahead further than my home state in efficiently harnessing distributed generation. Problems with grid congestion have lessened the cost-effectiveness of wind technology, which is an intermittent source of renewable energy. It sounds like Vivace might be a constant source of non-fluctuating generation, available 24/7. That would greatly enhance the cost-effectiveness of power generated with the Vivace system. How tall is the system? How deep must a river be to maximize Vivace’s performance? What, if any, impact has winter freezing had on Vivace’s performance? Often large tree branches or whole trees are carried by currents in rivers. How are the Vivace cylinders protected from large debris — or is the system placed deep enough that that’s not an issue? Are you able to use underwater stationery video systems to see the equipment, once it’s installed? Is there a robotic device that could do what the diver you’re waiting for would have to do to fix the existing equipment problem? How strong a current is needed for this system to work effectively in a river? Since you indicated the river opens up into Lake St. Clair, which in turn connects with Lake Huron, I wondered whether the river current would be strong enough if you were further upstream, or whether it’s important to place Vivace close to a point where a river runs into a larger body of water? How does Vivace’s performance compare to that of a “worm” system, another form of underwater, current- or wave-based renewable energy I heard about several years ago? I’d love to hear back from someone on the Vivace team, with answers to the above questions. (I’m not an investor or a competitor. I work in a utility regulatory consumer advocate office and am interested in finding the most cost-effective renewable generation options to try to keep energy costs lower for consumers.)


    • Deborah Holdship

      Hi, Karol: I forwarded your email to the article’s author and asked him to pass along your questions to the researchers. Here’s hoping you hear back! (Ed.)