Throughout my 45-year academic career as an exercise physiology research professor at the University of Michigan, including founder and director of the Weight Control Clinic, I counseled hundreds of adults on how to increase physical activity to lose body weight and fat.
At the time, the sensible argument that a sedentary lifestyle was the major culprit of excess weight gains seemed self-evident. Faced with relatively few physical demands, modern-day humans burn fewer calories than we consume. Hence, we store unspent calories as body fat. Even the World Health Organization, in discussing the cause of obesity, cited a “decrease in physical activity due to the increasingly sedentary nature of many forms of work, changing modes of transportation, and increasing urbanization.”
The above hypothesis seems reasonable, and experts have spent tremendous resources in efforts to increase levels of physical activity amongst different populations. However, barring a few exceptions, most of the exercise/weight-loss data, whether collected on a few individuals or large groups, has failed to prove that hypothesis. It leads one to question whether decreased energy expenditure, per se, represents the cause of increased weight gain.
And so the debate about the global obesity “pandemic” — and how to resolve it — continues. One of every three people worldwide is overweight, and one of every eight is obese! The attendant health risks of being overweight or obese include type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and certain cancers, as well as countless other negative health issues.
I can say that, based on recent data and new hypotheses, I have changed my view on whether energy expenditure (exercise) or energy intake (diet) is more important for weight loss. As the title of this piece says, “You can’t outrun your diet.”
Mathematics of body weight change
We know the “mathematics” of weight gain expresses as an energy imbalance, with food energy intake (calories per day) necessarily exceeding total energy expenditure (calories per day). This energy imbalance, favoring energy storage (in the form of body fat), is thought to result from our Western lifestyle, where physical activity levels and food intake deviate substantially from conditions under which our metabolic physiology evolved.
It is unclear whether obesity results from modern conveniences and mechanization leading to decreased physical activity — and hence lower total daily energy expenditure — or from systematic increases in energy-dense food intake.
Determining which aspects of the Western lifestyle are aberrant and pose the greatest stimulus for weight gain and obesity is complicated by conflicting and limited data on nonWestern populations. Until recently, we lacked comparative data on hunter-gatherer societies’ daily diet and energy expenditure, to try and tease out exactly what factors contribute most to the growing obesity crisis. For example, while Western diets are certainly more sugar-rich and energy-dense than more ‘‘traditional’’ diets that include wild foods, corroborative data are limited. Similarly, we automatically assume high physical activity levels for our paleo hunter-gatherer subsistence ancestors, but actual metabolic measurements are lacking.
Finding an answer: The Hadza experiments
The Hadza, or Hadzabe, are an indigenous ethnic group of hunter-gatherers living in the savannah-woodland environment of Northern Tanzania. The Hadza are considered descendants of Tanzania’s aboriginal hunter-gatherer populations and probably have occupied their current geography for thousands of years, with relatively little modification to their basic way of life. Their lifestyle is similar in most ways to those of our Pleistocene ancestors. They hunt and gather on foot with bows, small axes, and digging sticks, without the aid of modern tools or equipment (e.g., no vehicles or guns).
As in many other forager societies, gender differences play into foraging efforts. Hadza men hunt game and gather honey, while Hadza women gather plant foods. As is typical among traditional-living Hadza, more than 95 percent of their calories come from wild foods, including tubers, berries, small- and large-game, baobab fruit, and honey.
In a series of experiments with the Hadza, researchers measured total energy expenditure (TEE), body composition, and food intake and compared results to similar data from Western populations. Researchers also measured subjects’ resting metabolic rate and daily walking distance using wearable GPS devices. Given their physically active lifestyle, one would expect the Hadza have lower body fat than people in Western populations. Further, if current models for obesity are correct, the Hadza, with their natural diet and lack of mechanization, should expend more energy than individuals living in Western economies with comparatively sedentary lifestyles and highly processed, sugar- and fat-rich diets.
Nevertheless, contrary to expectations, total energy expenditure among Hadza adults was similar to current Western (U.S. and European) populations. The absence of significant differences between the Hadza and Western populations for total energy expenditure does not appear to result from poor methods or procedures, or any extraneous factors.
Challenging current theory
Similarities of total energy expenditure among very active Hadza hunter-gatherers and more sedentary Western populations challenge the view that it is the sedentary Western lifestyle causing obesity in developed countries.
Despite huge differences in the amount of activity energy expended, it is telling to note the number of total daily calories the Hadza burn was indistinguishable from that of typical adults in Europe and the U.S.
Even for very active individuals like the Hadza, energy expended through physical activity accounts for only a small portion of daily energy expenditure. In fact, most energy expenditure is spent on other metabolic activity not related to physical activity. This includes sleeping and resting energy expenditure, energy expenditure for digestion, energy expenditure for metabolic-hormone activity, brain function, transfer of substances across cell walls, neurological and endocrine functions, etc. In essence, our bodies adapt to our daily routines to keep overall energy expenditure at relatively constant levels, independent of what we do during the day.
Implications for weight loss
To successfully attack obesity in the long run, we need to focus on our diet and reduce the number of calories we eat. Specifically, we must avoid highly processed, energy-dense but nutrient-poor foods that contribute excess calories to our diet — more than we can burn off through normal daily activity.
We gain weight and body fat because we eat too much, not because we’re too sedentary. Physical activity is vital for maintaining physical and mental health, as I have detailed in many of my Health Yourself columns, but we are not going to exercise our way out of the obesity crisis.
- Donnelly, J.E., Smith, B.K. “Is exercise effective for weight loss with ad libitum diet? Energy balance, compensation, and gender differences.” Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 2005;33:169.
- Marlowe, F.W. “Hunter-gatherers and human evolution.” Evolutionary Anthropology, 2005.14:54.
- Pontzer, H. “Constrained total energy expenditure and the evolutionary biology of energy balance.” Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 2015;43:110.
- Pontzer, H., et al. “Energy expenditure and activity among Hadza hunter-gatherers.” American Journal of Human Biology, 2015;27:628.
- Pontzer, H., et al. “Constrained total energy expenditure and metabolic adaptation to physical activity in adult humans.” Current Biology, 2016;26:410.
- Pontzer, H., et al. “Hunter-gatherer energetics and human obesity.” PLoS One, 2012;7:e40503.
- Swinburn, B.A., et al. “The global obesity pandemic: shaped by global drivers and local environments.” Lancet 2011;378: 804.