The space in between
Decades ago, when a journal editor removed the term ‘nano’ from an article he had submitted, pioneering researcher Raoul Kopelman (1933-2023) was at a loss for words. The prefix, which is Greek for ‘dwarf,’ stands for one-billionth of a meter — or 10-9 — in the International System of Units. It was an accurate descriptor for the teeny, tiny particles at the heart of Kopelman’s study, but the editors feared readers wouldn’t know the term. They opted for ‘sub-micro’ instead.
As more scientists explored the field, those same editors eventually came to embrace the terms ‘nanoscience’ and ‘nanotechnology,’ which describe the ability to see and control individual atoms, molecules, or small clusters.Kopelman, who joined the U-M chemistry faculty in 1966, was less concerned with the label than the realm it described. Mostly, it was the space between those atoms, molecules, and clusters that really intrigued the scholar.
“Whole universes are in there,” he told Michigan Today just months before he died in 2023.
Let’s get small
Some 57 years after he arrived at Michigan, Kopelman remained an active participant in ‘NanoWorld,’ advancing breakthroughs in precision medicine and developing interdisciplinary graduate-level courses in chemistry, technology, climate science, and artificial intelligence.
Research topics ranged from solid-state physics to biomedical engineering. All of his work was characterized by a rare focus on interdisciplinarity and most of it featured collaborations with treasured mentees who continue to have an impact in the industry; many are tenured professors at prestigious universities around the world.
Kopelman authored more than 700 scientific papers, patents, and books, and is perhaps best known for developing the Hoshen-Kopelman algorithm, a simple and efficient algorithm for labeling clusters on a grid, where the grid is a regular network of cells, with the cells being either occupied or unoccupied. The algorithm’s practical application is so widespread in modern technology that scholarly citations of the work pop up every single day on Google Alerts. Some 5,000 citations have appeared since publication of his 1976 paper “Percolation and Cluster Distribution. I. Cluster Multiple Labeling Technique and Critical Concentration Algorithm.”
The mentor’s journey
In his final months, Kopelman was eagerly preparing for a reunion, on what would have been his 90th birthday, with more than 70 doctoral students and dozens of postdocs who had been trained in his U-M lab. Before arriving in Michigan in 1966, he was at the Technion (the Israel Institute of Technology), Columbia University, Harvard University, and Caltech. Four of his former students are Nobel laureates: Richard Smalley, Eric Betzig, Roald Hoffman, and Arieh Warshel.
One of his closest colleagues and former students, Panos Argyrakis, PhD ’79, had been visiting his mentor and longtime co-author twice a year since 1980. Argyrakis is a professor of computational physics at Greece’s University of Thessaloniki. It was Kopelman who set Argyrakis on that path five decades ago as together they discovered the nascent technology of computer modeling.
Converting data from analog to digital in the early days (using a computer that consumed the entire floor of a university building) offered a scientifically robust method to analyze, corroborate, and advance Kopelman’s research. He was working with lasers in the ’70s and when Argyrakis demonstrated an aptitude for computational modeling, Kopelman seized upon his mentee’s skills.
“He realized early on that I was better at calculations than doing measurements in his lab,” Argyrakis says. “I was able to study the same systems as Raoul, but computationally, rather than from the lab bench.”
A glass half full
In October 2023, Michigan Ross professor and Raoul’s daughter, Shirli Kopelman, curated and hosted a memorial symposium to celebrate her father. Stellar Multidisciplinary Research hosted more than 100 of Kopelman’s mentees and colleagues; they spent the day reflecting on the scholar’s research impact, which transcended academic disciplines, inspired entrepreneurial and institutional innovation, and contributed to the public good.
“Raoul was competitive but collegial, a ‘glass-half-full’ guy,” said Betzig, co-recipient of the 2014 Nobel Prize in Chemistry. “Today’s medical molecular cancer research is an extension of Raoul’s original idea.”
Betzig is a professor of molecular and cell biology, the Eugene D. Commins Presidential Chair in Experimental Physics, a Senior Fellow at the Janelia Research Campus, and Investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute at the University of California, Berkeley. His mentor inspired an ability to move between fields as he made publishable, important contributions in multiple areas.
“Raoul had an immense imagination and sought impact in everything he did,” Betzig said.
That imagination allowed Kopelman to reinvent himself as he investigated new areas, said Theodore Goodson III, the Richard Bernstein Collegiate Professor of Chemistry at U-M.
“No matter what we were going to talk about — the theory of excitons or some applications about biomedicine — I knew that when I walked out of the room a couple of hours later, we would have some kind of solution to the problem,” Goodson said.
Mad skills
Argyrakis, a scholar of theoretical condensed matter physics, remembers using his prehistoric computer in Greece in the early ‘80s. At the time it was considered cutting edge and small, considering the early ’60s version took up an entire room. Before trekking to Ann Arbor, Argyrakis would transfer his data onto a hard floppy disc the size of a vinyl record album that “weighed about 10 pounds.” Much of his work with Kopelman revolved around particle systems and diffusion, dubbed the “random walk.” The phenomenon exists throughout nature, from single atoms to entire galaxies. The duo co-authored numerous papers on the topic as Kopelman successfully attracted funding to continue.
“Raoul was among the top faculty for bringing money to the chemistry department, which at times was very difficult,” Argyrakis said. “One of his biggest satisfactions was to pursue groundbreaking, high-impact research and at the same time, guide his students to become independent thinkers.”
Kopelman’s determination could not be contained, even as heart issues and other medical conditions temporarily affected his movement and eyesight. U-M’s Xueding Wang, the Jonathan Rubin Collegiate Professor of Biomedical Engineering, was co-writing a proposal with his colleague when he suggested they defer until Kopelman was in better health.
“Raoul said, ‘Why? I still have one hand that can type. I still have one eye that can look at the screen.’ So we worked on it together — and we got funded,” Wang said.
Kopelman’s energy wasn’t all about academics, though. He placed an equal emphasis on social discovery. He was known to invite students to live with his family as needed and opened his door for dinners and other casual interactions.
“He treated everyone like a big family and you got to see how scientists really worked, what they really thought,” said Eric Monberg, PhD ’77, of Optical Fiber Research.
“Raoul was a model mensch,” said Rachel Goldman, Maria Goeppert Mayer Collegiate Professor, U-M professor of materials science and engineering, professor of physics, and associate director of the Program in Applied Physics. She had planned to invite the scientist to join the department’s advisory board before she learned he had passed away.
In an editorial published in ACS Sensors, “Remembering Raoul Kopelman (1933–2023),” Heather Clark, PhD ‘99, described her mentor’s unique approach to science and his genuine kindness as a person.
A mentor’s legacy
It’s mind-boggling to consider the dramatic progress in the field of computing since Kopelman first recognized its potential. In the 1960s, he advocated the use of computing in the chemistry department, despite detractors who dubbed the effort “anti-educational.” Even so, he introduced the use of computer punch cards in his undergraduate lab course in physical chemistry. In 1977, while serving on the Rackham Graduate School Executive Board, he proposed that PhD students write and print their theses using the university computer. The faculty were dubious.
Argyrakis, though, was up to the challenge. He’d spent so much time in the university’s computer lab on Kopelman’s behalf that he’d befriended the author of a rudimentary, experimental, and text-only word-processing program. To locate the cursor, the user twirled knobs to control a vertical and horizontal hairline until they intersected, because the mouse had not been invented yet. Printing a huge document that complied with the university’s stringent doctoral standards wasn’t easy, but in 1978, Argyrakis became the first doctoral candidate at Michigan to write and print his entire thesis using a computer.
At the symposium in 2023, Argyrakis had tears in his eyes when he spoke: “Raoul was an integral part of my life for 50 years minus three months. He was always there to encourage, to offer his empathy at difficult times, and help to elevate one’s spirits. With his acumen, he offered himself and all his resources to that purpose.”
Fantastic
In his final years, Kopelman focused on precision medicine, covering novel diagnostic and therapeutic techniques for cancer and heart disease. Implanting nanoparticles that precisely and specifically target and kill dangerous cells, the technology uses noninvasive and otherwise harmless red light, instead of high-energy lasers, X-rays, or gamma rays. With collaborators in U-M’s Medical School, Kopelman applied this technology to treat cancer and heart arrhythmia in rodents and sheep.
He may have been captivated by the nano, but Kopelman always favored the big picture. He preferred to focus on the future instead of the past — unless he was reflecting on his early childhood in Israel. His family had fled Vienna during World War II to escape the Nazis. They settled in Tel Aviv when Kopelman was five years old.
“I would stare at the night sky and could see galaxies beyond the Milky Way,” he said.
When he read Jules Verne’s Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea as a child, and later, The Fantastic Voyage by Isaac Asimov, Kopelman set his sights on the undiscovered and as-yet-unnamed world of nano. Asimov’s plot tracks a research crew reduced to a microscopic fraction of their original size, boarding a miniaturized atomic submarine and being injected into a dying man’s carotid artery.
“Raoul was as free-spirited as he was scientific,” said Robert Kennedy, U-M’s Hobart H. Willard Distinguished University Professor of Chemistry, Pharmacology. “His work was a fantastic voyage.”Metaphors like that tiny submarine inspired Kopelman throughout his career, said daughter Shirli Kopelman.
“He saw fractals where others saw trees,” she said. “His work will continue to light the path of future generations.”
(Lead image courtesy of Shirli Kopelman: Raoul Kopelman and his mentee/colleague Panos Argyrakis, PhD ’79, met twice a year for decades, continuing to collaborate until Kopelman’s death in 2023.)
Panos Argyrakis - 1979
Raoul has been an inspiration for me since my early days in Michigan in the 1970s. I have the best memories of all our interactions, both at the scientific and personal level; these are very sentimental moments for me.
Reply
Alan McLean - 2020
Dr. Kopelman had a unique approach where he empowered students to take leadership while guiding them to become independent scientists. I will forever cherish our conversations exploring new ideas and brainstorming how to operationalize them empirically. He was an amazing mentor we had and I miss him greatly.
Reply
Bob Kennedy
Raoul was the platonic ideal of a scientist. He was ever curious, energetic, bold, careful, and inclusive. I always learned something from talking to Raoul and found him uplifting because of his positive outlook and enthusiasm. He was also caring and never failed to ask me about my parents after learning was of them was ill.
Reply
Rachela Popovtzer - post doc 2008
Prof. Kopelman was not only an outstanding figure in academia, but also a deeply influential mentor. His brilliance, charm, and kindness left a lasting impact on all who had the privilege of learning from him. His guidance shaped my career, as well as the careers of many others, offering unwavering support and inspiring us to strive for excellence. His wisdom, generosity, and dedication were unparalleled, and his influence will remain with us for years to come. His legacy continues to guide and inspire.
Reply
Murphy Brasuel - 2002
Professor Kopelman was a brilliant mind and a caring mentor. As a graduate student in the 1990’s under his guidance I learned the creativity and critical thinking essential to contributing to progress in science. As important, I learned self-care, as Dr. Kopelman understood the pressure and stress experienced by his graduate students and would give us explicit permission for self-care when he noticed the need.
Reply
Heather Clark - 1999
Raoul was the type of mentor who let his trainees take the lead on their projects, and delighted in discussions over the resulting data. When I called down to his office (yes, we used phones with cords back then) to tell him I had results on a big project, I would immediately hear his footsteps in the hallway as he rushed down to see the data and go over the results. His love of science was infectious, and he passed that love of science on to decades of trainees.
Reply
Paras Prasad - Postdoc 1971-74
I could not have asked for a better mentor than Professor Raoul Kopelman, who contributed to my professor career in so many ways. He inspired me to think outside of the box and do what would make a difference. He also gave me the most valuable opportunity of supervising some of his students while he was on sabbatical. Raoul continued to give me valuable advice and guidance throughout my academic career.
Reply
Bob Kuczkowski
Raoul’s research was of great interest to graduate students. But also his charism. I recall an especially memorable visit to Raoul’s office one afternoon years ago. He enthusiastically shared the news that his group was learning to pull optical fibers into sub-micro-tips to focus light on nano samples. He got so excited that he had to take me to his lab to have a demonstration. This was in the early stages of his groups remarkable efforts that led to bio analysis applications in cells and disease.
Reply
Jeffrey Anker - 2005
Raoul Kopelman was a fantastic mentor: kind, thoughtful, inquisitive, enthusiastic, well balanced, and full of stories. His approach to science and life was inspirational to me, and I sorely miss him.
Reply
Irene Blandy - 2012
Professor Kopelman have always instilled the importance of curiosity and tackling challenges head on, as they are not roadblocks but just another beautiful path. I continue to apply your teachings to friends and family and am grateful for your positive impact in my life.
Reply
Peter Friedman - 1974 (PhD) and 1976 (postdoc)
I was Raoul’s 1st grad student and when I started he had only been at UM for just over 1 year and didn’t yet have a lab. What surprised me was that he immediately trusted my judgement in designing equipment and not micromanaging what I was working on. This is what led to me being an experimentalist and not being intimidated in taking on new challenges including moving into completely new fields over the course of my career. We have kept in close contact for over 50 years and for many years Raoul’s family was like my own extended family. His interest in his students was humanistic in addition to scientific and one could talk with Raoul in depth on almost any subject. He is greatly missed and I think of him often.
Reply
Eric Fauman - Undergraduate 1987
Dr. Kopelman was my honors undergraduate P Chem prof and honors thesis advisor and subsequently my coauthor on my very first scientific publication in 1988. When I visited him in Ann Arbor in 2022, 34 years later, we picked up right where we had left off. He was full of stories spanning the decades right up the present. I love reading everyone else’s positive recollections of their time with him.
Reply