A combo platter of crises
The combined crises of the past year have darkened the attitudes of local government leaders, according to the first results of the University of Michigan’s 2021 Michigan Public Policy Survey.
Numerous challenges have dominated public policy and governance across the state, including the health, education, and economic consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as the political arguments about lockdowns, mask wearing, vaccine distribution, and other public health measures.
Beyond the pandemic, the year saw a contentious presidential race, widespread protests spurred by the murder of George Floyd in Minneapolis and a plot to kidnap and murder Gov. Gretchen Whitmer.
Among the survey’s key findings:
- Statewide, 67% of local government officials say Michigan has gotten off on the wrong track — the highest level of pessimism reported since tracking began in 2011. Meanwhile, just 23% say the state is generally going in the right direction, a record low number.
- As in the past, these views are strongly associated with partisan identification, though declining assessments of the state’s direction are found among all partisan groups. Among self-identified Republican local leaders, just 10% say the state is going in the right direction, down from 26% last year. Among Independents, 24% believe the state is currently headed in the right direction, down from 39% in 2020. And while 63% of Democrats remain optimistic about the direction of the state, this percentage is also down from last year’s high of 72%.
- Evaluations of Whitmer’s job performance have also fallen sharply in the past year. Nearly half (48%) of Michigan’s local officials rate her performance in 2021 as poor, compared to 31% in 2020. Roughly a third (30%) currently rate her performance as either excellent or good, down from 39% last year. Ratings of good or excellent for Whitmer are found among 79% of Democratic local leaders, compared with 41% of Independents and 10% of Republicans.
- One element that all parties seem to agree upon is a low view of the performance of the Michigan Legislature. Statewide, 40% of local leaders say the legislature is doing a poor job, compared to 19% who said the same in 2020. Only 14% say its performance is either excellent or good. These are the lowest ratings for the legislature since tracking of these views began.
- Although Republican local leaders have been the most likely to give the legislature positive ratings in prior surveys, these have dropped substantially. Today, just 15% of Republicans say the legislature is doing an excellent or good job, in line with assessments by Independents (12%) and Democrats (15%).
- Another area of bipartisan agreement: In addition to the direction of the state overall, the survey asks for views on the direction of both the U.S. as a whole, and of their own local county, township, city, or village. While partisan differences are clear at the state and national levels, when it comes to confidence in their jurisdiction’s direction, local leaders are uniformly positive.
The Center for Local, State, and Urban Policy at U-M’s Ford School of Public Policy conducts the MPPS every spring. The 2021 Michigan Public Policy Survey gathered that information during April and May, through its census survey of 1,856 general-purpose local governments throughout the state.
“The last year has brought significant challenges for our state, its communities and citizens, including many impacts from the historic pandemic,” says Tom Ivacko, director of CLOSUP. “Local leaders across Michigan are telling us that state leaders haven’t met these challenges yet, and as a state we’re heading in the wrong direction today.”
MPPS project manager Debra Horner says “even though local leaders across the state report that their individual communities tend to be on the right track, the current pessimism about the direction of both Michigan and the U.S. is widespread.”
Launched in the wake of the Great Recession in 2009 by CLOSUP, the MPPS is conducted in partnership with the Michigan Association of Counties, Michigan Municipal League, and Michigan Townships Association.
Mike Jefferson - 1979
The challenge in this survey is that it measures the attitudes of the complicit rather than those who provide the consent. The fundamental difference between America and most other political systems is the “leaders” are accountable to the people and not the other way around. It’s unfortunate that the liberal elite has rejected that operant in favor of their monarchical tyranny. P.S. we fought that revolution some 250+ years ago.
Reply
Jim Hallett - 1972
I agree, Mike, but the problem is that leaders seem to only be accountable to the corporate interests that bought them. The slide into Left socialism and Marxist is sad, but academia and totally corrupt media bear the brunt of that. Our FBI is corrupt, our “president” is a dysfunctional sock puppet, and tyranny is at an all-time high – not to mention people being unwilling to actually think. They just bow to the babble of their overlords. Perhaps a little reading of Thomas Sowell would be in order for these mush minds.
Reply
Jim Batterson - 1978
Worthless.
How shocking that local officials feel
their communities are heading in the
right direction, but those at the state
level are heading in the wrong direction.
Fluff.
Reply
Don Dierkes - 1961
Most rural areas of Michigan are controlled by Republicans. They also dominate our Legislative bodyies. Rurals are generally happy with their local government, but unhappy with the majority population of the State, which tends to be Democratic. State white elections, Democratic, rural local, Republican.
Reply
Ronald Bogdasarian - 1978 (residency)
First it was the former president attacking the governor, then a public self proclaimed militia, then a UM regent, and the legislative opposition, and the restive public, while she has made considerable effort to confront the most difficult problem to face the world in many years. They all might have attempted helpful solutions.
Reply
Robert Gierada - 1980
Jeff, I appreciate your tracking and presentation of government performance. It is quite interesting. My opinion is that our government (federal & state) have unfortunately turned to self promotion rather than service to the constituents that elect them. Democratic party or Republican party are focus on power & control, spending beyond reasonable means, & neglecting to protect our national sovereignty. Perhaps it’s time to consider further limits on our elected leaders such as eliminating executive orders that do not follows established law, do away with standard & all to frequent debt ceiling extension, end politician & government employee pensions & health care packages (packages that can be fulfilled by existing 401K plans & medicare benefits most US citizens participate in). Thanks for the chance to comment.
Reply