Office of the VP for Communications – Keeping alumni and friends connected to U-M

A global nuclear renaissance?

Building capacity

After a 30-year hiatus in new construction, a handful of U.S. utility companies are moving forward with plans to join a “nuclear renaissance” that seems to be affecting countries around the globe.  All told, some 40 countries — mainly in the Middle East and Asia — have committed to building their first atomic-power plants, or to adding new ones to their existing nuclear capacity.

Meanwhile, in France — the Western country that has had perhaps the best experience with fission-based nuclear power — a state-controlled company runs the country’s nuclear power plants. Nearly 80 percent of the power is generated by nuclear plants. Recycled nuclear waste provides about 17 percent of the fuel. But the French are discussing phasing out some plants following the Fukushima disaster.

Elsewhere in Europe, there are a total of 185 nuclear power plant units in operation in 16 countries, including five in the Asian region of the Russian Federation, according to data from the European Nuclear Society.

Waste management

Achieving public agreement for how nuclear waste will be disposed is key to the long-term success of any country’s nuclear policy. Finland and Sweden seem to be leading the way in this regard, as communities there have begun the local construction of permanent disposal sites.

Support for nuclear power in Europe is not universal, however. Italians and 10 other European countries, plus Australia and New Zealand, remain adamantly opposed to nuclear power. Nations who use nuclear power, including Switzerland and Germany, are discussing phasing out their plants.

Germany was opposed to nuclear power after large parts of the nation were contaminated by the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear meltdown. But by 2011 there were enough nuclear plants in Germany to supply almost 20 percent of its power. After the 2011 Fukushima nuclear disaster in Japan, however, German Chancellor Angela Merkel reversed course, and now Germany is in the process of shuttering all nuclear plants and fast-tracking renewable energy technology.

Leading the charge

Meanwhile, according to the World Nuclear Association, Asia is the main region in the world where nuclear power is growing significantly. In East and South Asia there are 119 operable nuclear power reactors, 49 under construction, and firm plans to build a further 100. Hundreds more are proposed. The greatest growth in nuclear generation is expected in China, South Korea, and India.

And, perhaps most tellingly, the government of Japan has announced it is preparing to restart some of the country’s 48 commercial nuclear reactors that were closed after the 2011 Fukushima disaster. Only two years ago, the former government had announced plans to eliminate nuclear power altogether. Restarting the plants is almost an economic necessity for Japan, a country that has few fossil fuel resources of its own.

One plant is expected to be restarted in the near future, with oversight by a newly reorganized and strengthened safety and operations monitoring agency. It remains to be seen whether or not the reopening will be accompanied by the kinds of public protest that rocked Japan up until recent months.

Comments

  1. Grant Shafer - 1995

    The article states that there have been no civilian deaths caused by the nuclear industry in America. That claim is disputable. Studies indicate increase in cancer fatalities due to the 3 Mile Island accident, as well as increased birth defects. Another study indicates nearly a million excess deaths owing to the Chernobyl accident.
    Another issue is why, after more than half a century, the nuclear industry still requires govt aid? By now, if it were economically viable, it would be economically independent.
    The bottom line is that the highly toxic waste produced by the nuclear industry will last for thousands to billions of years. No short term profit is worth that cost in human misery and death. That nuclear energy is still advocated is an eloquent testimony to the power of money and how stupidly highly intelligent people can act.

    Reply

Leave a comment: