Office of the VP for Communications – Keeping alumni and friends connected to U-M

Fight the policy, not the politician

Fight the power

The 2020 political conventions are over. The candidates have accepted their virtual nominations via Zoom. The opposing versions of reality have been broadcast to a polarized nation of voters.

And, as in virtually every presidential election since George Washington’s second term, Americans have trained their focus on the leading candidates at the top of each opposing ticket. As a collective, it seems, U.S. citizens set impossibly high expectations for the future leader of the free world. We invest an inordinate amount of energy into the sole individual who becomes our nation’s chief executive, and wait anxiously for Nov. 3.

Historian Mary Frances Berry, PhD ’66/JD ’70/HLLD ’97, doesn’t play that game. The author of History Teaches Us to Resist (Beacon  Press, 2018) has worked for multiple administrations of both parties. Some presidents were ideological allies. Others were adversaries. All were recalcitrant till pushed.

“You can’t blame politicians for acting politically,” Berry says. “That’s what they do.”

Essential ingredients

Berry is one of the nation’s leading activists for gender equality and social justice. She actively protested the Vietnam War and advocated for the Free South Africa and civil rights movements. Her extensive career spans six decades and includes leadership roles in both higher education and government service. She is the Geraldine R. Segal Professor of American Social Thought at the University of Pennsylvania.

“People completely miss the point when they say, ‘The election is almost here; you should put your efforts there instead of protesting,’” Berry says. “If you have big issues that you want dealt with — whether it’s race, whether it’s climate change — you have to make the [administration] do whatever it is you want. You need to make them commit before the election and you need to be prepared to push them once they are elected. You should be organizing around that. This is the time you should gird up for a great battle and get ready for real extensive protests till you see it happen.

“If you just sit around and let the politicians tell you that ‘all you need to do is vote,’ that’s the biggest mistake you can make.”

Walking the walk

History teaches us to resist book cover

Beacon Press, 2018

Berry is the former chairwoman of the United States Commission on Civil Rights, an appointment made under President Jimmy Carter that she sued to retain under President Ronald Reagan. In addition, she was provost of the Division of Behavioral and Social Science at the University of Maryland, College Park, and was the first African American chancellor of the University of Colorado at Boulder.

Soon after Donald Trump was elected U.S. president in 2016, she grew weary of the Democratic “mourning” about his perceived shortcomings and demagoguery. The anti-Trumpers who took to the streets were off the mark, she says. So she wrote the book (her 13th), which is subtitled How Progressive Movements Have Succeeded in Challenging Times.

“The idea of the book was not ‘organize to oppose Trump,’” Berry said during a live, digital presentation at New York’s 92nd Street Y in August. “I am not interested in changes in personal behavior. I want structural change.”

The text reminds activists that protest is an essential element of politics. And progressive movements can flourish, even in these perilous times of violence in the streets, a climate crisis that produces fire tornados, and a global pandemic that has claimed more than 180,000 American lives.

“I think the book is more important today than when I wrote it,” she said.

Following are Berry’s thoughts on social activism in 2020.

Have clear, immediate goals

Most political runs are about putting people in office who may do something, but who usually are most concerned about getting re-elected or making appointments. After they win, they will be most interested in donors, cronies, old friends.

That’s why it’s so important to have clear, immediate goals and demands, and you have to be consistent and persistent in applying pressure. Many of the people participating in the BLM protests voted for Democrats who control the House of Representatives at this moment. And members of the House can say, ‘Oh we passed something,’ and act as though that’s enough. Well, even if you did pass something, you need to work on it, and try to figure out how you can pass something into law. Because it’s not the House of Representatives that’s a co-equal branch of the government. It’s the House and Senate — the Congress.

The president you think is your friend is often the most difficult to convince

The only way you get politicians to do anything is to make them do it. When Barack Obama was elected, no one would pressure him to do anything because we were just so damn happy he was there. People would say, ‘Leave him alone. Let’s make sure we can have him four more years.’ Everybody agrees that his policies were less than robust. It was the same with Bill Clinton. The progressive community was so happy he was elected that they left him to his own devices. And he knew that.

Be patient, but relentless

The people in power always think you’ll give up. They wait you out. So when you start a movement to make major social change, you have to be in it for the long haul. This pandemic and the economy seem to allow people the time and flexibility to be persistent right now.

In the Free South Africa Movement, we protested every day for 18 months at the embassy in Washington. We got protesters arrested every night. Protests were organized on college campuses and around the country. After a year of protesting, we got Congress to pass sanctions and then Reagan vetoed it. So we protested for another six months. Ultimately those sanctions helped to secure Nelson Mandela’s release from prison and end apartheid.

Own your narrative

You need an identifiable leader and a spokesperson. This is where Occupy Wall Street struggled. The media did not know who to talk to. You also cannot let your movement be hijacked by people who come in and who really don’t agree with what you’re doing or who don’t want your movement to succeed. I saw a young woman on TV who was saying the looting and the violence [around the BLM protests] didn’t make any difference. It was fine, she said. She shouldn’t have said that. Because looting and violence is not fine. That narrative is not going to advance understanding of what you’re doing or to get people to listen.

Change is incremental

When we look back on 2020? Unfortunately, we’ll say a lot of people died and a lot of people got sick from [the coronavirus]. People will talk about how we bounced back from all the economic dislocation. The question is, are we going to change the things we should have changed already on social justice and inequality in our society? If I had to guess, I would say we will change it incrementally, which is what always happens. But we’re not going to get rid of injustice altogether.

And let us hope that another unarmed person does not get killed or brutalized in the meantime.

(Top image courtesy of upenn.edu.)

Comments

  1. joe biden

    It’s time to treat people as individuals and get to work.

    Reply

  2. Kelly Van Rijn - 1989

    Instead of the constant harping in diversity and what by definition divides us, let us instead focus of what makes us all Americans. By focusing on black lives instead of all lives, by focusing of perceived slights instead of personal responsibility, the agitators of hate keep fanning the flames of discourse.

    Reply

    • Dawn Moulton - 1983

      Kelly, saying Black Lives Matter is a response to the racial injustice apparent in this country against black lives. It is not saying only black lives matter. It’s saying, “we matter too,” not “we are the only ones that matter.” Diversity, by definition, means variety, it connotes inclusivity not divisiveness. Please do not fall into the easy trap of calling people “agitators of hate” when they are standing up for their rights. I would love to see a United States of America where personal responsibility is not impeded by racial injustice.

      Reply

      • Kelly Van Rijn - 1989

        The entire BLM movement was founded by Marxists on the now proven false narrative of hands up don’t shoot. The equally false narrative of systemic racism has replaced personal responsibility as the excuse why blacks aren’t succeeding at rates commensurate with their numbers. Where Morgan Freeman, Candice Owens and Sen Tim Scott have it right, race baiters like Al Sharpton, Don Lemon and the entire BLM movement have got it wrong.

        Reply

    • Barbara Benton - 1969

      Suppose you were Black and your parent or grandparent came out of the military in the 1960s to find the GI bill was implemented very differently than for whites. Yes, you could buy a house, but only in a poor neighborhood with terrible schools, leaving your children with little opportunity. Or suppose you are a Black mother today, having to warn your son that he would be stopped for no reason or could be shot if, for example, someone thought they were acting suspiciously. This isn’t about “perceived slights”; it’s about decades and centuries of different and damaging treatment of one part of society by those with more power. Activism, working against this treatment—I don’t mean burning buildings, I mean educating and organizing groups and nonviolently demonstrating—IS taking personal responsibility.

      Reply

  3. Linda Grashoff - 1964 AB, 1976 AM

    “You can’t blame politicians for acting politically,” Mary Frances Berry says. “That’s what they do.” This observation, paired with Berry’s admonition to “be consistent and persistent in applying pressure” shows a clear way forward. May we remember her words and act accordingly.

    Reply

  4. Lisa Fetman - 2007

    While I have not (yet) read Berry’s work, I think one key takeaway not acknowledged here is the importance of voting down-ballot, as well as in ALL elections. In accordance with Berry’s arguments, the heightened emphasis on electing our President needs to be shifted; though I add that it is essential that we put the same amount of effort into electing not only our legislators and governors, but also into voting for/against ballot measures, whether or not to retain judges, who serves on our school boards, etc. These are key forces that shape state and local policies that affect us directly, and also influence national policies. Unfortunately many states make it difficult to find comprehensive, reliable information on these individuals, and many ballot measures are veiled in complex legal jargon. It is extremely important that we do our research, vote in every aspect, and demand that our states provide us with clear, unbiased, readily-available information so that we may make impactful, informed decisions that cause positive shifts in policy.

    Reply

Leave a comment: