U-M team recycles previously unrecyclable plastic

‘Just one word: Plastics’

PVC, or polyvinyl chloride, is one of the most produced plastics in the United States and the third highest by volume in the world.

VC makes up a vast amount of plastics we use on a daily basis. Much of the plastic used in hospital equipment — tubing, blood bags, masks, and more — is PVC, as is most of the piping used in modern plumbing. Window frames, housing trim, siding, and flooring are made of, or include, PVC. It coats electrical wiring and comprises materials such as shower curtains, tents, tarps, and clothing.

It also has a zero percent recycling rate in the United States.

Now, University of Michigan researchers, led by study first author Danielle Fagnani and principal investigator Anne McNeil, have discovered a way to chemically recycle PVC into usable material. The most fortuitous part of the study? The researchers found a way to use the phthalates in the plasticizers — one of PVC’s most noxious components — as the mediator for the chemical reaction. Their results are published in the journal Nature Chemistry.

PVC’s ‘unique set of problems’

“PVC is the kind of plastic that no one wants to deal with because it has its own unique set of problems,” says Fagnani, who completed the work as a postdoctoral researcher in the U-M Department of Chemistry. “PVC usually contains a lot of plasticizers, which contaminate everything in the recycling stream and are usually very toxic. It also releases hydrochloric acid really rapidly with some heat.”

Plastic is typically recycled by melting it down and reforming it into the lower quality materials in a process called mechanical recycling. But when heat is applied to PVC, one of its primary components, called plasticizers, leach out of the material very easily, McNeil says.

They then can slip into other plastics in the recycling stream. Additionally, hydrochloric acid releases easily out of PVC with heat. It could corrode the recycling equipment and cause chemical burns to skin and eyes — not ideal for workers in a recycling plant.

What’s more, phthalates — a common plasticizer — are highly toxic endocrine disruptors, which means they can interfere with the thyroid hormone, growth hormones, and hormones involved with reproduction in mammals, including humans.

So, to find a way to recycle PVC that does not require heat, Fagnani began exploring electrochemistry. Along the way, she and the team discovered that the plasticizer that presents one of the major recycling difficulties could be used in the method to break down PVC. In fact, the plasticizer improves the efficiency of the method, and the electrochemical method resolves the issue with hydrochloric acid.

“What we found is that it still releases hydrochloric acid, but at a much slower, more controlled rate,” Fagnani says.

‘There’s a great future in plastics. Think about it.’

‘Let’s be strategic’

PVC is a polymer with a hydrocarbon backbone, Fagnani says, composed of single carbon-carbon bonds. Attached to every other carbon group is a chlorine group. Under heat activation, hydrochloric acid rapidly pops off, resulting in a carbon-carbon double bond along the polymer’s backbone.

But the research team instead uses electrochemistry to introduce an electron into the system, which causes the system to have a negative charge. This breaks the carbon-chloride bond and results in a negatively charged chloride ion. Because the researchers are using electrochemistry, they can meter the rate at which electrons are introduced into the system — which controls how quickly hydrochloric acid is produced.

The acid can then be used by industries as a reagent for other chemical reactions. The chloride ions can also be used to chlorinate small molecules called arenes. These arenes can be used in pharmaceutical and agricultural components. There is material left from the polymer, for which McNeil says the group is still looking for a use. Fagnani says the study shows how scientists might think about chemically recycling other difficult materials.

“Let’s be strategic with the additives that are in plastics formulations. Let’s think about the during-use and end-of-use from the perspective of the additives,” says Fagnani, who is now a research scientist at Ashland, a company focused on making biodegradable specialty additives to consumer goods such as laundry detergents, sunscreens, and shampoos. “Current group members are trying to improve the efficiency of this process even more.”

The focus of McNeil’s lab has been to develop ways to chemically recycle different kinds of plastics. Breaking plastics into their constituent parts could produce non-degraded materials that industry can incorporate back into production.

“It’s a failure of humanity to have created these amazing materials which have improved our lives in many ways, but at the same time to be so shortsighted that we didn’t think about what to do with the waste,” McNeil says. “In the United States, we’re still stuck at a 9 percent recycling rate, and it’s only a few types of plastics. And even for the plastics we do recycle, it leads to lower and lower quality polymers. Our beverage bottles never become beverage bottles again. They become a textile or a park bench, which then ends up in a landfill.”


  1. Melissa Meyer - 1987

    I am so excited to see recycling of PVC begin. I hope to see more ocean cleanup efforts and continued recycling efforts from UofM.


  2. Jenny Morton - 1982

    Great article. I would like to post it on our Sustainable Marblehead (of Massachusetts) Facebook and Instagram pages.


  3. Lloyd Phillips - 1965 Dental school

    One of the most important recycling discoveries of our lives.


  4. Kathryn Breslin - 1978, 1983 (MD)

    Very interesting article.


  5. DANIEL BERENT - 1978, 1980

    This article is completely misleading! Whether that is intentional or not I cannot say, but the fact is that PVC is mechanically recycled at a very high rate. The statement that PVC has a zero recycling rate in the US comes right after the sentence that notes that PVC is used in window frames, housing trim, siding, and flooring. In 1992 I founded and still run a company that specializes in the recycling and re-extrusion of PVC scrap generated in the production of window frames, siding, fencing, and decking. In our 30 years of operation we have recycled over HALF A BILLION pounds of rigid PVC, primarily from window frames.

    Rigid PVC has a relatively high recycling rate compared to flexible (plasticized) PVC, which the bulk of this article refers to. The rate is also dependent upon whether you are referring to post-consumer or post-industrial waste PVC. But the recycling rate of both rigid and flexible PVC is well above zero.

    I do not wish to detract from the accomplishment of this research team, and I am all in favor of new recycling technologies to boost the plastics recycling rate further; in fact there is a percentage of what we receive that would lend itself to chemical recycling. So while I follow new innovations in chemical recycling with interest, I am compelled to set the record straight.


    • Tim Redmond - 1970

      Glad to see your comments, Daniel. And bravo to your company’s role in repurposing some of our country’s huge stream of pvc/plastic waste. In my view, the manufacturing community should be taking far more responsibility for the waste created by their production.


    • Anne McNeil - NA

      As the researcher involved in this study, I feel compelled to respond to this comment.

      The EPA reports recycling rates for different plastics and for PVC it reports “negligible”. See Table 8 on Page 11 at this link: https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2021-01/documents/2018_tables_and_figures_dec_2020_fnl_508.pdf

      Either the EPA isn’t tracking these smaller scale efforts, such as your company, or these smaller scale efforts are a small % compared to production, or it is only tracking post-consumer PVC. I’m not sure. Either way, we provide the EPA’s report as a reference to our statement in the original research article.


Leave a comment: