Discovery channels
Innovation is nothing new at U-M’s Museum of Natural History (UMMNH).
As early as 1841, the University broke with precedent by inviting the general populace to view exhibits in its “Cabinet of Natural History.” With that simple move, the first public museum in Michigan opened its doors.
Entertaining “civilians” was an uncommon notion at the time. Whether it housed works of art, artifacts or specimens, a museum’s original function had been to assemble and manage materials reserved solely for the use of private collectors and scholars. Today, U-M’s herbarium and its museums of anthropological archaeology, paleontology, and zoology continue to serve this critical research function. But a museum’s public function — to engage the average citizen in scientific discovery — is just as critical, says Amy Harris, UMMNH director.
“We want people to experience doing the kinds of things that scientists do,” Harris says of a future museum that will draw visitors into the scientific enterprise. “Our new opportunity is to talk about the process of science and to engage with some of the people who are doing that work.”
So in the spirit of 1841, U-M is reimagining and relocating the UMMNH from its home in the historic Alexander G. Ruthven Museums Building to the nearby Biological Science Building (BSB). The building is under construction; it sits on the site once occupied by North Hall and the Museums Annex, and is adjacent to the Life Sciences Institute. The BSB will open for classes in fall 2018, at which point the museum will begin a three-stage, yearlong rollout of exhibits. The full complement of galleries and program spaces will open to the public by fall 2019.
Active, not passive
Future UMMNH visitors will travel a winding path through the modern structure, passing galleries, labs, and exhibits. In some cases, they also may be able to observe and interact with working scientists. So instead of just viewing a dinosaur skeleton, one might have the chance to ask a paleontologist about the process of preparing bones for study or display. And museum faculty, graduate students, and postdocs will be prepared to answer in a way that best connects with curious visitors. An ongoing Science Communication Fellows program is designed to help them articulate the wonders of their work to a general audience.“There aren’t many opportunities for the public to engage with university research, so whenever we can create experiences where people are doing something, we feel we’re on a better track than something that’s more passive,” Harris says.
“We’ll still have the hallmarks of a natural history museum,” she continues, “with specimens and artifacts on display, but we’re going to be in an active research building.”
The Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology; the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology; the Museum of Paleontology, and the Ann Arbor campus offices for the U-M Biological Station also will be housed in the BSB.
Staying true to the mission
Lynne Friman, project manager for UMMNH and the College of Literature, Science, and the Arts (LSA), is a self-described museum gypsy and change agent. She oversaw the Detroit Institute of Arts’ re-installation project and the building of the IMAX wing at The Henry Ford. She also was project manager for the U-M Museum of Art’s renovation and installation.
“The DIA’s audience is very different from the Natural History Museum’s,” says Friman, “but in many ways, a museum is a museum. They’re not that different when you’re developing the experience. The content is different, the goals are different, but the visitors’ needs and the experience are not that different.”
Learning styles, however, can be different. So designers solicited and considered public feedback as they conceptualized the new site and its interactive functionality. This process also has roots in UMMNH history. In 1933, in one of the earliest forms of a visitors’ study, Crystal Thompson, curator of the Department of Visual Education (as the museum was called then), obtained funding from the Carnegie Corporation. She sought to study the ways in which museum exhibits educate general audiences about science. That information must have been very helpful when, in 1956, the UMMNH became a freestanding unit within LSA, rather than a department of the research museums.
Incorporating new technologies and teaching techniques has always been the name of the game, says Harris. “We recently worked with a neurologist who figured out how to project real brain scans on a planetarium screen. Now we can take people on a tour of the brain.”
Out with the old
Meanwhile, back in the Ruthven Museums Building, the challenges of the move itself are top of mind. The UMMNH is home to about 3,750 artifacts and specimens, whose survival depends on expert handling even in ordinary circumstances. And this transition is anything but ordinary.
“We have to think about the materiality of everything we move,” Friman says.Literally. Every thing.
Luckily, there is expertise in the neighborhood, another blessing of propinquity. Due to their own relocation, the research museums at Ruthven have to move materials to the new Research Museums Center on the south side of Ann Arbor.
“There’s a whole group of people who have been trained in moving artifacts and specimens with great care,” Friman says. “We’re learning a lot from them, and we’re going to continue to take advantage of that as we move.”
Next month, experts will begin the process of moving the museum’s giant Edmontosaurus,the skeleton of a duck-billed dinosaur. The rest of the specimens will be removed after the UMMNH closes to the public, following a New Year’s Eve celebration they’re calling the “Last Night at the Museum.”
In with the new
Purists who plan to visit the new site will be pleased to know the same pair of pumas that flank the Ruthven Museums Building today will be posted at the UMMNH entrance in the BSB’s east atrium. In the new location, the pumas will face one another, as opposed to resting in parallel. Two mastodon skeletons will greet visitors on entry—the only display of a mastodon couple anywhere.
“We will continue to offer experiences in the new museum that are more contemplative,” Harris says. “There will be things to look at and places to sit and take things in a little bit.”
As for Ruthven’s future, it will become home to the University’s central administration following an extensive renovation the Regents approved in December 2016. The Ruthven project also will add 100,000 square feet for learning classrooms, an ideal opportunity to preserve and reuse a landmark campus building. The Fleming Building, built in the early 1960s and current home to the administration, is set for demolition in the next few years.
Sharon Meyer (maiden name: Talbot) - 1965
In 1961 I signed up to be a docent in the hope it would help me with my science classes. It did! I also learned the names of all the area Indian tribes! I loved that job, and it was part of the reason I later became a teacher.
Reply
Lori Dick
@Sharon Meyer – Please share your memories with us!
http://sites.lsa.umich.edu/museum-memories/
Reply
Margaret Nelson Anderson - 1970
My mother, Ruth Morris, took a Museum Techniques Class from Dr. Ruthven in about 1927 in a classroom upstairs in the Museum with a fire going in the fireplace. She loved her part-time job there handling specimens. She took all her children & grandchildren to the museum. My daughter loved the exhibit about fungi, and she & my mother laughed together when it showed athlete’s foot & mushrooms were in a class together! (My daughter always hated both of them
Reply
Clyde McKenzie - BBA '70, MBA '74
Progress and change at the University are bedrock parts of its institutional strength. However, I do hope that the campus always honors Robben Fleming’s considerable leadership. I won’t miss that building much, but I have a warm place in my heart for President Fleming.
Reply
Tom Kress - 1962
I grew up in Ann Arbor during the 40’s and 50’s and remember as a youngster roaming the halls of the N.H.M. I was learning and didn’t even know I was learning. I hope that the new museum will be as open to youngsters as was the Ruthven Museum.
Reply
Lorraine King - 1969 (BA Antropology & Zoology), 1972 (BS Architecture), 1973 (MArch)
I was a tour guide and manned the reception desk for many years. I loved the place and how it helped me through architecture school. I also worked for many years at the Smith Group in Detroit. What a challenging design project the new Natural History Museum (plus the other ancillary spaces) must be. Good luck. I will try to come and see the place when it is finished, but it is a long way from London where I now live.
Reply
Connie Ogg - 1970
I am still in possession of the small amber stone that I purchased on a school field trip to the N.H.M. more than 60 years ago. I am already looking forward to visiting when renovations are complete. And, I am thrilled the
“lions” will still have a place of honor.
Reply
MICHAEL BAILEY - 1973
I always enjoyed walking past those [pumas] as I walked from married housing to my classes in SNR. I visited the exhibits often as a student in the early 70’s and brought my children in the 80s. I can not wait to take my grandchildren to the new facility when it opens in 2018. Go Blue – The greatest university inn the nation!!
Reply